Being a teacher is a tough job, with a lot of responsibilities. In addition, an educator must have a large amount of knowledge about the teaching and learning process (calculating your GPA) to be effective. In this piece, we will look at classroom management questions that an effective teacher should be able to answer.
What is the Self-Discipline Approach?
This is an approach to classroom management based on the principle that students are inherently responsible persons that can be trusted to both evaluate and make amendments when they misbehave. It also presupposes that the relationship between students (calculating your grades) and their instructors is mutually respectful. This self-governing approach to classroom management (120 debate topics) comprises four models, viz-a-viz:
● Inner Discipline,
● Assertive Discipline,
● Desist Approach, and
● Behavior Modification.
What is Inner Discipline?
The inner discipline model, established by Barbara Coloroso, features inner discipline as a route to behavioral correction and is a noticeably more time-consuming approach. The major objective of this model is to provide students with the tools to develop self-discipline, which then enables them to exhibit control and a sense of accountability about their actions. Instructors need to allow students to make their own choices; regardless of whether said choices result in good outcomes, except these choices threaten either the student or other classmates in any way.
This model expects that when a student misbehaves, instructors need to find out what kind of collaborative approach is best to achieve the best possible results. With regards to the cooperative efforts of teachers and students, the inner discipline model is a fantastic one, resulting in the sharing of power within the community. The baseline idea for this model is that when short-term solutions, e.g., the usage of reward systems, are implemented, it doesn’t result in lasting discipline.
Coloroso described three kinds (elementary debate topics) of instructors—the “brick-wall” instructors, “backbone” instructors, and “jellyfish” instructors, based on their correctional methods. “Brick-wall” teachers/instructors tend to be very firm and demand students to obey preset rules without room for questioning or any exceptions. For the “backbone” teachers/instructors, the provision of support to students is behind the scenes and their effect is to be felt, not seen. Lastly, “jellyfish” instructors/teachers don’t have clear-cut rules and will often change punishments or rewards. Hence, students don’t expect uniformity of approach from them.
What is Assertive Discipline?
This classroom management approach is centered around the thought that the classroom power structure is skewed more towards the direction of teachers- who have the power to demand specified actions from the students (ten reasons), with these required actions targeted towards the students’ best possible outcomes. Canter’s research showed that the utilization of the assertive discipline approach was higher among teachers who aren’t authoritarian. While these instructors may double down on their requirements from students, their approach is still very level-headed with regard to the enforcement of classroom regulations.
With this disciplined approach, instructors can lay down very clear rules for students (kid’s debate topics) to follow, highlighting the fact that with a misdemeanor, there will be specific consequences. So, for the students to enjoy positive outcomes, they have to be well-behaved. Otherwise, in the face of a misdemeanor, there will be negative consequences for those actions.
What is the Desist Approach?
Due to its ease of implementation, the desist approach is one that is commonly used. In contrast to the self-discipline approach, which makes students responsible for their actions, here, teachers are the responsible ones. It is directly correlated to how power is wielded in the classroom setting, with teachers having more power and laying down specific class rules for disciplining and correcting students’ behavior
It fuses the approach covered in the “Assertive Discipline” model, as well as “Behavior Modification,” which is discussed next.
What question did I leave off?
